Features of the formation of the land use efficiency of agricultural enterprises under the conditions of the martial law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2023.07.03.04Keywords:
land use efficiency, economic sustainability, agrarian economy, production intensity, martial law.Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of the study is to assess the formation peculiarities of land use efficiency in agricultural enterprises of Kharkiv region under the conditions of martial law.
Results. The authors have built regression models of the dependence between the amount of income, expenses and profit per 100 hectares of agricultural land according to the data of 2020 and 2022. In 2020, an increase in the net income by UAH 1 million led to an average increase in profit by UAH 146.2 thousand, in 2022 – by UAH 204.1 thousand. An increase in the total amount of expenses by UAH 1 million per 100 hectares of agricultural land led to an average increase in net income by UAH 1,301.8 thousand in 2020, and by UAH 698.1 thousand in 2022. Comparison of the average values of profit and expenditure per 100 hectares of agricultural land according to the data for 2020 and 2022 using the Student’s t-test made it possible to establish that the average profit in 2020 was equal to UAH 546.2 thousand, while in 2022, it was equal to UAH 44.1 thousand. Such a difference makes the average disparity almost 100% reliable. This is evidenced by both the t-test value (5.067) and the reliability level of the difference in means (p = 0.000). The article established a significant difference in costs per unit of land area in 2020 and 2022. Using the Student’s t-test, we confirmed the reliability of this difference.
Scientific novelty. The conducted research shows that the military aggression of the russian federation had a significant impact on the economic efficiency of land use. In 2022, the profit and costs per unit of land area decreased significantly in agricultural enterprises in Kharkiv region. However, the amount of net income in nominal terms did not change significantly.
Practical value. The main task of the agrarian sector enterprises in the conditions of martial law should be preservation of human capital, the farming system in order to maintain the fertility of the soil as well as the material base for further development. This will make it possible to quickly restore production volumes and introduce new technologies in the period after the end of hostilities.
References
Мокій А. І., Небрат В. В., Король М. М., Флейчук М. І. Трансформаційні процеси в Україні в повоєнний період: міждисциплінарні оцінки. Економіка України. 2023. № 1. С. 74–88. URL: http://economyukr.org.ua/?page_id=723&lang=uk&aid=602.
Alonso-Trabanco J. M. The geoeconomic significance of the Ukraine war. Economy of Ukraine. 2023. No. 4. Pp. 25–37. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.04.025.
Онищенко В. П. Людський і соціальний капітал України в період її післявоєнного відновлення. Економіка України. 2023. № 1. С. 3–19. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.01.003.
Radchenko O., Strykhovskyi D., Leontovych S. Impact of martial law on development financial mechanism of the agricultural sector of Ukraine. Ekonomika APK. 2022. Vol. 29. No. 5. Pp. 47–56. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202205047.
Осташко Т. О. Зерновий експорт України в умовах війни. Економіка України. 2023. № 8. С. 28–46. https://doi.org/10.15407/econo myukr.2023.08.028.
Matsybora T. (2023). Investment activity in Ukrainian agriculture during the war: new challenges and threats. Ekonomika APK. 2023. Vol. 30. No. 5. Pp. 10–18. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202305010.
Malik M., Shpykuliak O., Kravchenko S., Malik L., Yuzhykova V. Development of farms in wartime conditions. Ekonomika APK. 2023. Vol. 30. No. 1. Pp. 40–50. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202301040.
Malik M., Kravchenko S., Diuk A., Malik L., Nechyporenko M. Development of micro-entrepreneurs in agriculture in wartime conditions. Ekonomika APK. 2023. Vol. 30. No. 2. Pp. 10–23. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202302010.
Malik M., Kravchenko S., Shpykuliak O., Malik L., Yuzhykova V. Adaptation of business entities in the agrarian sector of the economy to activities in wartime conditions. Ekonomika APK. 2022. Vol. 29. No. 6. Pp. 28–40. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202206028.
Кучер А. Методика оцінювання збитків, завданих збройною агресією земельному фонду та ґрунтам: проблеми та напрями вдосконалення. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability. 2022. Vol. 6. Is. 2. 10. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2022.06.02.10.
Zhuk V., Pugachov M., Shpykuliak O., Bezdushna Yu., Popko Ye. Application of accounting for the assessment of war losses for agribusiness enterprises of Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2023. Vol. 9. No. 3. Pp. 197–215. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2023.09.03.09.
Ilchuk M., Nikitchenko S., Sytnyk O., Pavlenko V. Diversification of entrepreneurial activities in the agricultural sector of Ukraine’s economy in the post-war period. Ekonomika APK. 2023. Vol. 30. No. 4. Pp. 25–35. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202304025.
Dibrova A., Ilchuk M., Konoval I., Androsovych I., Zanizdra A. State support for agriculture in Ukraine in the post-war period. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2023. Vol. 9. No. 3. Pp. 49–76. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2023.09.03.03.
Mohylnyi O., Kalinchyk M., Hryshchenko O. Post-war restructuring of the agricultural sector of Ukraine: elimination of distortions to achieve stability and well-being. Ekonomika APK. 2022. Vol. 29. No. 6. Pp. 10–27. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202206010.
Кістерський Л. Л. Стратегічні принципи повоєнного відновлення України. Економіка України. 2023. № 2. С. 3–16. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.02.003.
Ковалів О. І. «Когнітивна земельна економіка» – основний ключ до звершення земельної реформи в Україні як нової парадигми. Ефективна економіка. 2021. № 6. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2021.6.8.
Kucher A. Sustainable soil management in the formation of competitiveness of agricultural enterprises: monograph. Plovdiv: Academic publishing house «Talent», 2019. 444 p. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19554.07366.
Kucher A. Soil fertility, financial support, and sustainable competitiveness: evidence from Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2020. Vol. 6. No. 2. Pp. 5–23. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.02.01.
Богіра М. С. Вплив ринкової економіки на раціональне використання земель. Збалансоване природокористування. 2017. № 1. С. 88–91. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Zp_2017_1_19.
Kucher A. Financial support for the formation of sustainable competitiveness of land use of agricultural enterprises: monograph. Plovdiv: Academic publishing house «Talent», 2022. 884 p. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21182.77125.
Гулінчук Р. М. Стратегічні напрями підвищення ефективності використання потенціалу земель сільськогосподарського призначення. Збалансоване природокористування. 2018. № 2. С. 113–118. https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.2.2018.276399.
References
Mokiy, A., Nebrat, V., Korol, M., & Fleychuk, M. (2023). Ttransformation processes in Ukraine in post-war period: interdisciplinary estimates. Economy of Ukraine, 1, 74–88. Available at: http://economyukr.org.ua/?page_id=723&lang=uk&aid=602.
Alonso-Trabanco, J. M. (2023). The geoeconomic significance of the Ukraine war. Economy of Ukraine, 4, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.04.025.
Onуshchenko, V. (2023). Human and social capital of ukraine in the period of its post-war reconstruction Economy of Ukraine, 1, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.01.003.
Radchenko, O., Strykhovskyi, D., & Leontovych, S. (2022). Impact of martial law on development financial mechanism of the agricultural sector of Ukraine. Ekonomika APK, 29(5), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202205047.
Ostashko, T. (2023). Grain export of ukraine in the conditions of war. Economy of Ukraine, 8, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.08.028.
Matsybora, T. (2023). Investment activity in Ukrainian agriculture during the war: new challenges and threats. Ekonomika APK, 30(5), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202305010.
Malik, M., Shpykuliak, O., Kravchenko, S., Malik, L., & Yuzhykova, V. (2023). Development of farms in wartime conditions. Ekonomika APK, 30(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202301040.
Malik, M., Kravchenko, S., Diuk, A., Malik, L., & Nechyporenko, M. (2023). Development of micro-entrepreneurs in agriculture in wartime conditions. Ekonomika APK, 30(2), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202302010.
Malik, M., Kravchenko, S., Shpykuliak, O., Malik, L., & Yuzhykova, V. (2022). Adaptation of business entities in the agrarian sector of the economy to activities in wartime conditions. Ekonomika APK, 29(6), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202206028.
Kucher, A. (2022). Methodology for assessing damages and losses caused by the armed aggression to the land fund and soils: problems and directions of improvement. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 6(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2022.06.02.10.
Zhuk, V., Pugachov, M., Shpykuliak, O., Bezdushna, Yu., & Popko, Ye. (2023). Application of accounting for the assessment of war losses for agribusiness enterprises of Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 9(3), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2023.09.03.09.
Ilchuk, M., Nikitchenko, S., Sytnyk, O., & Pavlenko, V. (2023). Diversification of entrepreneurial activities in the agricultural sector of Ukraine’s economy in the post-war period. Ekonomika APK, 30(4), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202304025.
Dibrova, A., Ilchuk, M., Konoval, I., Androsovych, I., & Zanizdra, A. (2023). State support for agriculture in Ukraine in the post-war period. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 9(3), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2023.09.03.03.
Mohylnyi, O., Kalinchyk, M., & Hryshchenko, O. (2022). Post-war restructuring of the agricultural sector of Ukraine: elimination of distortions to achieve stability and well-being. Ekonomika APK, 29(6), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202206010.
Kistersky, L. (2023). Strategic principles of Ukraine’s post-war recovery. Economy of Ukraine, 2, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2023.02.003.
Kovaliv, O. (2021). “Cognitive land economy” – the main key to the accomplishment of land reform in Ukraine as a new paradigm. Efektyvna ekonomika, 6. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2021.6.8.
Kucher, A. (2019). Sustainable soil management in the formation of competitiveness of agricultural enterprises. Plovdiv, Academic publishing house «Talent». https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19554.07366.
Kucher, A. (2020). Soil fertility, financial support, and sustainable competitiveness: evidence from Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 6(2), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.02.01.
Bogira, M. S. (2017). The influence of the market economy on the rational use of land. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia, 1, 88–91. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Zp_2017_1_19.
Kucher, A. (2022). Financial support for the formation of sustainable competitiveness of land use of agricultural enterprises. Plovdiv, Academic publishing house «Talent». https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21182.77125.
Hulinchuk, R. (2018). Strategic priorities for improving the efficiency of using the agricultural land potential. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia, 2, 113–118. https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.2.2018.276399.
