Theoretical preconditions for the development of accounting in forestry enterprises on the challenges of sustainable development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2023.07.03.05Keywords:
sustainable development, sustainable forestry, accounting development, forestry.Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of the article is the formation of theoretical principles of accounting in forestry enterprises on the challenges of the concept of sustainable development, in terms of defining the directions of improving the information support system of rational forestry for the purpose of preservation, reproduction and use of forest resources at the micro and macro levels of the economy.
Results. Based on the results of the study, it is established that to ensure the functioning of domestic forestry enterprises on the principles of sustainable development, a necessary condition is to take into account economic, environmental and social goals in management. For this purpose, the directions of economic operations on forest use (harvesting and processing of forest products, reproduction of forest resources) are identified, which can be used as a basis for clarifying the composition of accounting objects specific to forest enterprises for further development of their organizational and methodological support. It is proved that forest resources and losses caused to the environment due to irrational forest use should be reflected in accounting, which will allow forming information support for forest resources management at the microeconomic level.
Scientific novelty. The lack of a developed management mechanism that would ensure the conservation, reproduction and rational use of forest resources leads to the loss of national wealth. The evolution of the modern world market economy necessitates the interaction of society and nature, which is based on the postulates of the theory of sustainable development. For forestry, it is the observance of the balance of economic interests of the subjects of forest relations and the protection of forest resources. The above necessitated the delineation of areas for improving the information system of rational forest use in order to preserve, reproduce and use forest resources at the micro and macro levels of the economy.
Practical value. The main results of the study can be used: at the microeconomic level (forestry enterprises) – to develop a management mechanism that would ensure the conservation, reproduction and rational use of forest resources; improvement of the system of information support of rational forest use in terms of development of organizational and methodological support of accounting of objects specific to forestry; at the macroeconomic level – to prevent the loss of a component of the country’s national wealth – forest resources; control over the availability and condition of forest resources, which is a component of economic security of the state.
References
Goals of sustainable development 2016–2030 (2015). Available at: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/diyalnist/cili-stalogo-rozvitku-ta-ukrayina.
Official website of the State Agency of Forest Resources of Ukraine (2022). Available at: http://dklg.kmu.gov.ua.
Synyakevych, I. M. (2012). National forestry policies in the context of global environmental threats. Economy of Ukraine, 1, 61–68. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/EkUk_2012_1_7.
Linser, S., & Lier, M. (2020). The contribution of sustainable development goals and forest-related indicators to national bioeconomy progress monitoring. Sustainability, 12(7), 2898. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072898.
Furdychko, O., Drebot, O., Palianychko, N., Dankevych, S., & Okabe, Y. (2021). On the way to balance of forestry land use of Ukraine: ecological-and-economic aspect. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 7(4), 218–244. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2021.07.04.12.
Furdychko, O., Drebot, O., Palianychko, N., Dankevych, S., & Okabe, Y. (2021). Ecological and economic reporting as an indicator of the state of forestry land use. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 7(2), 219–250. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2021.07.02.12.
Zhuk, V. M., Vasylishyn, S. I., Utenkova, K. O., Kovalova, O. V., Yarova, V. V., Skolotiy, I. V., & Kiryushina, L. Yu. (2021). The accounting improvement of ecological activity and agroecosystems conservation. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 11(1), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.15421/2021_33.
Sokil, O., Zvezdov, D., Zhuk, V., Kucherkova, S., & Sakhno, L. (2020). Social and environmental costs: the impact of accounting and analytical support on enterprises’ sustainable development in Germany and Ukraine. Economic Annals-XXI, 181(1–2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V181-11.
Sokil, O., Zhuk, V., Holub, N., & Levchenko, O. (2019). Accounting and analytical methods for identifying risks of agricultural enterprises’ sustainable development. In V. Nadykto (Ed), Modern Development Paths of Agricultural Production: Trends and Innovations (pp. 561–569). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14918-5_55.
Zhurakovska, I., Sydorenko, R., Fuhelo, P., Khomenko, L., & Sokrovolska, N. (2021). The impact of taxes on the reproduction of natural forest resources in Ukraine. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 12(3), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v12i3.1511.
Bolshakov, N. M. (2006). Post-industrial forest: state and prospects. Region, 6, 19–23.
Petruk, V. A., & Kozlovska, Yu. F. (2010). Assessment of the effectiveness of strategic management of forestry enterprises. Available at: http://nuwm.ru.ua/methods/asp/vd/v39ek30.doc.
Koval, J. V. (2012). Priorities of economic and balanced forest resource development. Economist, 12, 49–51.
Atroshchenko, N. O. (2012). Economic model for sustainable forest management. Proceedings of BSTU, 7(154), 46–48.
Zhuk, V. M. (2009). Kontseptsiia rozvytku bukhhalterskoho obliku v ahrarnomu sektori ekonomiky [The concept of accounting development in the agricultural sector of the economy]. Kyiv, NSC “IAE”.
Shevchuk, V. O. (2009). Absolute goods and the market: dimensions of sufficiency in theoretical economics. Economika APK, 3, 103–106.
Ozeran, V. O., & Chik, M. Yu. (2015). Implementation the concept of sustainable development in forestry. Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis, 3(21)1), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.26642/pbo-2011-3(21)Ч.1-266-273.
Tanasiieva, M., Zamula, I., Travin, V., Nitsenko, V., Balezentis, T., & Streimikiene, D. (2020). Assessment of the profitability of environmental activities in forestry. Sustainability, 12(7), 2998. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072998.
Neykov, N., Krišťáková, S., Hajdúchová, I., Sedliačiková, M., Antov, P., & Giertliová, B. (2021). Economic efficiency of forest enterprises – empirical study based on data envelopment analysis. Forests, 12(4), 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040462.
Wildberg, J., & Möhring, B. (2019). Empirical analysis of the economic effect of tree species diversity based on the results of a forest accountancy data network. Forest Policy and Economics, 109, 101982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101982.
Barker, R. (2019). Corporate natural capital accounting. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 35(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gry031.
