Development of “green” building in the context of “green” post-war recovery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2024.08.02.10Keywords:
“green” housing building, environmental and economic damage, russian-Ukrainian war, “green” post-war reconstruction, construction waste management, risk management, circular economy.Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of this study is to form a bibliometric landscape of the knowledge base regarding the development of “green” building in the context of the “green” post-war reconstruction of Ukraine and, using the example of a specific project, to show the possibility and feasibility of organising the recycling of waste from buildings destroyed as a result of war into products with added value in the value system of circular economy.
Results. The influence of the russian-Ukrainian war on the housing stock and the environment (in terms of destruction waste) is summarised. The trends and current state of scientific support for the development of “green” building in the world are determined, the leaders in terms of the number of studies on “green” building among countries, organisations and authors are identified. Research on “green” building is more concentrated in organisations of developed countries, primarily in China and the USA, rather than in developing countries. Bibliometric maps of the intensity and chronology of the use of terms in publications on “green” building in the world, as well as on scientific cooperation of different countries, are developed. Based on the identified clusters, the main areas of research are characterised; the necessity of their activation is determined in order to substantiate the mechanism of implementation of “green” building into the concept of “green” post-war reconstruction of Ukraine. The investment attractiveness of the project of organising the recycling of concrete from destroyed residential buildings as a result of military actions into secondary crushed stone is economically substantiated; an analysis of its riskiness is carried out using the break-even norm.
Scientific novelty. The ecological and economic foundations of the development of construction on the basis of the formation of the bibliometric landscape of the knowledge base regarding “green” building in the system of values of the “green” post-war reconstruction of Ukraine are further developed. One of the first attempts to substantiate the economic feasibility of circular projects of the organisation of processing waste from destroyed residential buildings into value-added products is presented.
Practical value. The results obtained on the basis of bibliometric analysis contribute to a better understanding of the development of “green” building in the world and the prospects of its application in Ukraine, in particular in the context of “green” post-war reconstruction. The justification of the circular project on the processing of waste from destroyed buildings can be useful for communities and other stakeholders for the development of business plans for similar projects and their risk management. The results can be useful for researchers and practitioners working in the field of “green” building, contributing to the intensification of research in Ukraine.
References
Загальна сума збитків, завдана інфраструктурі України, зросла до майже $155 млрд – оцінка KSE Institute станом на січень 2024 року. URL: https://kse.ua/ua/about-the-school/news/zagalna-suma-zbitkiv-zavdana-infrastrukturi-ukrayini-zrosla-do-mayzhe-155-mlrd-otsinka-kse-institute-stanom-na-sichen-2024-roku.
Смертельно небезпечно: чому відходи з руйнації війни можуть спричинити рак. URL: https://ua.korrespondent.net/articles/4669995-smertelno-nebezpechno-chomu-vidkhody-z-ruinatsii-viiny-mozhut-sprychynyty-rak.
Стан поводження з відходами від руйнувань в Україні станом на квітень 2024 року. URL: https://epl.org.ua/announces/stan-povodzhennya-z-vidhodamy-vid-rujnuvan-v-ukrayini-stanom-na-kviten-2024-roku.
Зелене повоєнне відновлення України: візія та моделі. Аналітична записка. Львів: ГО «Ресурсно-аналітичний центр “Суспільство і довкілля”», 2022. 32 с. URL: https://dixigroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/green_recovery.pdf.
Рябчин О., Кулага Д. Зелене відновлення України: керівні принципи та інструменти для тих, хто ухвалює рішення. Київ: KSE, 2023. 188 с. URL: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2024-04/undp-ua-green-recovery-ukr.pdf.
Андрусевич А., Козак З. Повоєнна зелена відбудова України: процеси, зацікавлені сторони, участь громадськості. Аналітичний звіт. Київ, 2024. 82 с. URL: https://ua.boell.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/racse-report_2024-5-13-1_ukr.pdf.
Білотіл В. Ю. Основні теоретичні засади, сучасний стан розвитку та тенденції формування «зеленого» будівництва в Україні в контексті сталого розвитку. Збалансоване природокористування. 2022. № 1. С. 63–73. https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.1.2022.255225.
Дребот О. І., Височанська М. Я., Білотіл В. Ю. Удосконалення організаційного механізму щодо розвитку «зеленого» житлового будівництва на прикладі сільських селітебних територій. Вісник аграрної науки. 2023. № 7(844). С. 60–71. https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk202307-07.
Дудяк Н., Баруліна І., Барулін Д. Інтеграція природоорієнтованих рішень у міські екосистеми в умовах стрімкої урбанізації та змін клімату. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability. 2024. Vol. 8. No. 1. 10. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2024.08.01.10.
Кривомаз Т. І., Циба А. М., Ільченко І. С., Гамоцький Р. О. Зелене будівництво у відновленні України. Освіта для сталого майбутнього: екологічні, технологічні, економічні і соціокультурні питання: кол. моногр.; за ред. В. П. Плаван, А. О. Касич, О. О. Бутенко. Київ: КНУТД, 2023. С. 11–13. URL: https://er.knutd.edu.ua/handle/123456789/26228.
Кривомаз Т., Чалий І., Гамоцький Р., Ільченко І., Циба А. Критерії ESG у зеленій відбудові України. Екологічна безпека та природокористування. 2023. Vol. 48. Is. 4. Pp. 5–20. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2023.4.5-20.
Chan A. P. C., Darko A., Olanipekun A. O., Ameyaw E. E. Critical barriers to green building technologies adoption in developing countries: the case of Ghana. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. Vol. 172. Pp. 1067–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.235.
Hoffman A. J., Henn R. Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building. Organization and Environment. 2008. Vol. 21. Is. 4. Pp. 390–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608326129.
Wang W., Zmeureanu R., Rivard H. Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization. Building and Environment. 2005. Vol. 40. No. 11. Pp. 1512–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.017.
Lu Y., Wu Z., Chang R., Li Y. Building information modeling (BIM) for green buildings: a critical review and future directions. Automation in Construction. 2017. Vol. 83. Pp. 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.024.
Ali H. H., Al Nsairat S. F. Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – case of Jordan. Building and Environment. 2009. Vol. 44. No. 5. Pp. 1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.07.015.
Paul W. L., Taylor P. A. A comparison of occupant comfort and satisfaction between a green building and a conventional building. Building and Environment. 2008. Vol. 43. Is. 11. Pp. 1858–1870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.11.006.
Leaman A., Bordass B. Are users more tolerant of “green” buildings? Building Research and Information. 2007. Vol. 35. Is. 6. Pp. 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701529518.
Eichholtz P., Kok N., Quigley J. M. The economics of green building. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2013. Vol. 95. Is. 1. Pp. 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00291.
Hwang B.-G., Tan J. S. Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. Sustainable Development. 2012. Vol. 20. Is. 5. Pp. 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.492.
Yang R. J., Zou P. X. W. Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: a social network model. Building and Environment. 2014. Vol. 73. Pp. 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.014.
Sangmesh B., Patil N., Jaiswal K. K., Gowrishankar T. P. et al. Development of sustainable alternative materials for the construction of green buildings using agricultural residues: a review. Construction and Building Materials. 2023. Vol. 368. 130457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130457.
Goubran S., Walker T., Cucuzzella C., Schwartz T. Green building standards and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Environmental Management. 2023. Vol. 326. 116552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116552.
Dong T., Yin S., Zhang N. The interaction mechanism and dynamic evolution of digital green innovation in the integrated green building supply chain. Systems. 2023. Vol. 11. Is. 3. 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11030122.
Şirin C., Goggins J., Hajdukiewicz M. A review on building-integrated photovoltaic/thermal systems for green buildings. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2023. Vol. 229. 120607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120607.
Shen Y., Pan Y. BIM-supported automatic energy performance analysis for green building design using explainable machine learning and multi-objective optimization. Applied Energy. 2023. Vol. 333. 120575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120575.
В Україні більшість громад не сортує відходи від руйнувань, – результати опитування. URL: https://rubryka.com/2024/04/14/v-ukrayini-bilshist-gromad-ne-sortuye-vidhody-vid-rujnuvan-rezultaty-opytuvannya.
References
$155 billion – the total amount of damages caused to Ukraine’s infrastructure due to the war, as of January 2024. Available at: https://kse.ua/ua/about-the-school/news/zagalna-suma-zbitkiv-zavdana-infrastrukturi-ukrayini-zrosla-do-mayzhe-155-mlrd-otsinka-kse-institute-stanom-na-sichen-2024-roku.
Deadly dangerous: why war waste may cause cancer (2024). Available at: https://ua.korrespondent.net/articles/4669995-smertelno-nebezpechno-chomu-vidkhody-z-ruinatsii-viiny-mozhut-sprychynyty-rak.
The state of waste management from demolitions in Ukraine as of April 2024 (2024). Available at: https://epl.org.ua/announces/stan-povodzhennya-z-vidhodamy-vid-rujnuvan-v-ukrayini-stanom-na-kviten-2024-roku.
Green post-war recovery of Ukraine: vision and models. Analytical note 2022 (2022). Lviv, Resource and Analysis Center “Society and Environment”. Available at: https://dixigroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/green_recovery.pdf.
Riabchyn, O., & Kulaha, D. (2023). Green recovery of Ukraine: guidelines and tools for decision makers. Kyiv, KSE. Available at: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2024-04/undp-ua-green-recovery-ukr.pdf.
Andrusevych, A., & Kozak, Z. (2024). Post-war green reconstruction of Ukraine: processes, stakeholders, public participation. Analytical report. Kyiv. Available at: https://ua.boell.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/racse-report_2024-5-13-1_ukr.pdf.
Bilotil, V. (2022). Basic theoretical fundamentals, current state of development and trends of formation of green construction in Ukraine in the context of sustainable development Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia, 1, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.33730/2310-4678.1.2022.255225.
Drebot, O., Vysochanska, M., & Bilotil, V. (2023). Improvement of the organizational mechanism for the development of green residential construction on the example of rural settlement areas. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 7(844), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk202307-07.
Dudiak, N., Barulina, I., & Barulin, D. (2024). Integration of nature-based solutions into urban ecosystems in the context of rapid urbanisation and climate change. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 8(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2024.08.01.10.
Kryvomaz, T. I., Tsyba, A. M., Ilchenko, I. S., & Hamotskyi, R. O. (2023). Green construction in Ukraine’s recovery. Education for a sustainable future: ecological, technological, economic and socio-cultural issues (pp. 11–13); eds. V. P. Plavan, A. O. Kasych, O. O. Butenko. Kyiv, KNUTD. Available at: https://er.knutd.edu.ua/handle/123456789/26228.
Kryvomaz, T. I., Chaliy, I. H., Hamotskyi, R. O., Ilchenko, I. S., & Tsyba, A. M. (2023). ESG criteria in green rebuilding of Ukraine. Environmental Safety and Natural Resources, 48(4), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.32347/2411-4049.2023.4.5-20.
Chan, A. P. C., Darko, A., Olanipekun, A. O., & Ameyaw, E. E. (2018). Critical barriers to green building technologies adoption in developing countries: the case of Ghana. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1067–1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.235.
Hoffman, A. J., & Henn, R. (2008). Overcoming the social and psychological barriers to green building. Organization and Environment, 21(4), 390–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608326129.
Wang, W., Zmeureanu, R., & Rivard, H. (2005). Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization. Building and Environment, 40(11), 1512–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.017.
Lu, Y., Wu, Z., Chang, R., & Li, Y. (2017). Building information modeling (BIM) for green buildings: a critical review and future directions. Automation in Construction, 83, 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.024.
Ali, H. H., & Al Nsairat, S. F. (2009). Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries – case of Jordan. Building and Environment, 44(5), 1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.07.015.
Paul, W. L., & Taylor, P. A. (2008). A. comparison of occupant comfort and satisfaction between a green building and a conventional building. Building and Environment, 43(11), 1858–1870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.11.006.
Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (2007). Are users more tolerant of “green” buildings? Building Research and Information, 35(6), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701529518.
Eichholtz, P., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2013). The economics of green building. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00291.
Hwang, B.-G., & Tan, J. S. (2012). Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 20(5), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.492.
Yang, R. J., & Zou, P. X. W. (2014). Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: a social network model. Building and Environment, 73, 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.12.014.
Sangmesh, B., Patil, N., Jaiswal, K. K., Gowrishankar, T. P., Selvakumar, K. K., Jyothi, M. S., Jyothilakshmi, R., & Kumar, S. (2023). Development of sustainable alternative materials for the construction of green buildings using agricultural residues: a review. Construction and Building Materials, 368, 130457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130457.
Goubran, S., Walker, T., Cucuzzella, C., & Schwartz, T. (2023). Green building standards and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Environmental Management, 326, 116552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116552.
Dong, T., Yin, S., & Zhang, N. (2023). The interaction mechanism and dynamic evolution of digital green innovation in the integrated green building supply chain. Systems, 11(3), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11030122.
Şirin, C., Goggins, J., & Hajdukiewicz, M. (2023). A review on building-integrated photovoltaic/thermal systems for green buildings. Applied Thermal Engineering, 229, 120607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120607.
Shen, Y., & Pan Y. (2023). BIM-supported automatic energy performance analysis for green building design using explainable machine learning and multi-objective optimization. Applied Energy, 333, 120575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120575.
In Ukraine, the majority of communities do not sort waste from destruction, according to the results of the survey (2024). Available at: https://rubryka.com/2024/04/14/v-ukrayini-bilshist-gromad-ne-sortuye-vidhody-vid-rujnuvan-rezultaty-opytuvannya.
