Interconnection between forest and water and their policy integration: a policy network analysis in the Indian context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2025.09.02.04Keywords:
sustainable forest management, sustainable water management, cross-sectoral policy integration, sustainable development goals, natural resource management.Abstract
Purpose. This research is primarily concerned with the unravelling of the interdependence and design of policy networks to facilitate the effective integration strategies. Whether India’s vital natural resources are being managed well is an important issue that must be addressed.
Results. The results of this study provide answers to three main research questions: (і) what is the nature of the interconnection between the Indian forest ecosystems and the water, (іі) what are the effects of policy networks on this integration, and (ііі) what are the optimal ways in which these networks can be designed to generate positive outcomes in the in the policy integration. Forest and water management in India is a complicated network of involvements among various stakeholders and policy objectives. The research describes the status quo of policy networks between the different sectors and indicates areas of strength and weakness regarding collaboration and integration effectiveness between sectors. Through a combination of secondary and primary data, including stakeholder interviews and policy network analyses, it became clear that forests and water are inextricably linked by a network of environmental, socio-economic and climatic factors.
Scientific novelty. This study delves into the intricate relationship between forest ecosystems and water resources and their policy integration within the Indian context. The study emphasises the indispensability of incorporating and integrating different aspects of natural resource management policy.
Practical value. This paper gives actionable recommendations on how to design a policy network that should be inclusive, adaptive, while being technically aided in policy formulation and implementation. This study leads to future possibilities for research in technological integration in policy networks and dynamic management of economic development and environmental conservation in the policy making process. Emerging research areas for which this discussion outlines the potential in relation to achievements in natural resource management remain to be further enriched for help in understanding how to effectively manage our natural resources.
References
Adam, S., & Kriesi, H. (2019). The network approach. In Theories of the Policy Process, 2 nd ed. (pp. 129–154). New York, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689-5.
Agneessens, F., Trincado-Munoz, F. J., & Koskinen, J. (2022). Network formation in organizational settings: exploring the importance of local social processes and team-level contextual variables in small groups using bayesian hierarchical ERGMs. Social Networks, 77, 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2022.07.001.
Alexander, S., Aronson, J., Whaley, O., & Lamb, D. (2016). The relationship between ecological restoration and the ecosystem services concept. Ecology and Society, 21(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08288-210134.
Andresen, E., Roxenhall, T., & Eklinder-Frick, J. (2014). Motivation, commitment, and innovation: a study of the interpersonal perspective in two Swedish network formation processes. The IMP conference, 3–6 September 2014, Bordeaux, France.
Baulenas, E., & Sotirov, M. (2020). Cross-sectoral policy integration at the forest and water nexus: national level instrument choices and integration drivers in the European Union. Forest Policy and Economics, 118, 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102247.
Baulenas, E., Kruse, S., & Sotirov, M. (2021). Forest and water policy integration: a process and output‐oriented policy network analysis. Environmental Policy and Governance, 31(5), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1951.
Bazzan, G., Daugbjerg, C., & Tosun, J. (2023). Attaining policy integration through the integration of new policy instruments: the case of the Farm to Fork Strategy. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 45(2), 803–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13235.
Boas, I., Biermann, F., & Kanie, N. (2016). Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16, 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9321-1.
Cheung, S. Y., & Phillimore, J. (2017). Gender and refugee integration: a quantitative analysis of integration and social policy outcomes. Journal of Social Policy, 46(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279416000775.
Creed, I. F., Weber, M., Accatino, F., & Kreutzweiser, D. P. (2016). Managing forests for water in the Anthropocene – the best kept secret services of forest ecosystems. Forests, 7(3), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7030060.
Dewulf, A., Craps, M., Bouwen, R., Taillieu, T., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2005). Integrated management of natural resources: dealing with ambiguous issues, multiple actors and diverging frames. Water Science and Technology, 52(6), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0159.
Di Gregorio, M., Fatorelli, L., Paavola, J., Locatelli, B., Pramova, E., Nurrochmat, D. R., ... & Kusumadewi, S. D. (2019). Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks. Global Environmental Change, 54, 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.003.
Di Gregorio, M., Nurrochmat, D. R., Paavola, J., Sari, I. M., Fatorelli, L., Pramova, E., ... & Kusumadewi, S. D. (2017). Climate policy integration in the land use sector: mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages. Environmental Science & Policy, 67, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.004.
Doimo, I., Masiero, M., & Gatto, P. (2020). Forest and wellbeing: bridging medical and forest research for effective forest-based initiatives. Forests, 11(8), 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11080791.
Domorenok, E., Graziano, P., & Polverari, L. (2021). Introduction: policy integration and institutional capacity: theoretical, conceptual and empirical challenges. Policy and Society, 40(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1902058.
Douglass, M. (2018). A regional network strategy for reciprocal rural – urban linkages: an agenda for policy research with reference to Indonesia. In The Earthscan Reader in Rural-Urban Linkages (pp. 124–154). London, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315800486-7.
England, M. I., Dougill, A. J., Stringer, L. C., Vincent, K. E., Pardoe, J., Kalaba, F. K., ... & Afionis, S. (2018). Climate change adaptation and cross-sectoral policy coherence in southern Africa. Regional Environmental Change, 18, 2059–2071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1283-0.
Eräranta, S., & Mladenović, M. N. (2021a). Networked dynamics of knowledge integration in strategic spatial planning processes: a social network approach. Regional Studies, 55(5), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1739637.
Eräranta, S., & Mladenović, M. N. (2021b). The impact of actor-relational dynamics on integrated planning practice. Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, 5(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.24306/TrAESOP.2021.01.002.
Escobedo, F. J., Giannico, V., Jim, C. Y., Sanesi, G., & Lafortezza, R. (2019). Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 37, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011.
Frost, P., Campbell, B., Medina, G., & Usongo, L. (2006). Landscape-scale approaches for integrated natural resource management in tropical forest landscapes. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-01932-110230.
Ghosh, S., Chatterjee, N. D., & Dinda, S. (2021). Urban ecological security assessment and forecasting using integrated DEMATEL-ANP and CA-Markov models: a case study on Kolkata Metropolitan Area, India. Sustainable Cities and Society, 68, 102773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102773.
Gilissen, H. K., Alexander, M., Beyers, J.-C., Chmielewski, P., Matczak, P., Chellenberger, T., & Suykens, C. (2016). Bridges over troubled waters: an interdisciplinary framework for evaluating the interconnectedness within fragmented flood risk management systems. Journal of Water Law, 25(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-08723-210427.
Gregorio, M. D., Nurrochmat, D., Locatelli, B., Fatorelli, L., Pramova, E., Sari, I., & Kusumadewi, S. (2016). Multi-level governance, policy networks and the integration of mitigation and adaptation in the land use sector: evidence from Indonesia. 2016 Berlin Conference on Transformative Global Climate Governance. Available at: https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/fub188/17912/DixGregorioxMLGxNetworksxIndonesia.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Grossiord, C., Granier, A., Ratcliffe, S., Bouriaud, O., Bruelheide, H., Chećko, E., ... & Gessler, A. (2014). Tree diversity does not always improve resistance of forest ecosystems to drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(41), 14812–14815. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411970111.
Guo, W. (2023). Policy beliefs, policy learning, and risk perception: exploring the formation of local creative Placemaking‐catalyzed policy network. Review of Policy Research, 40(1), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12508.
Guo, Y., Cao, L., Song, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2022). Understanding the formation of City-HSR network: a case study of Yangtze River Delta, China. Transport Policy, 116, 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.014.
He, X., Estes, L., Konar, M., Tian, D., Anghileri, D., Baylis, K., ... & Sheffield, J. (2019). Integrated approaches to understanding and reducing drought impact on food security across scales. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 40, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.09.006.
Hu, Q., Yeo, J., & Kapucu, N. (2022). A systematic review of empirical emergency management network research: formation and development, properties, and performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 52(4), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740221077348.
Hui, G., Zhang, G., Zhao, Z., & Yang, A. (2019). Methods of forest structure research: a review. Current Forestry Reports, 5, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-019-00090-7.
Kim, J. Y., Howard, M., Cox Pahnke, E., & Boeker, W. (2016). Understanding network formation in strategy research: exponential random graph models. Strategic Management Journal, 37(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2454.
Koide, R., & Akenji, L. (2017). Assessment of policy integration of sustainable consumption and production into national policies. Resources, 6(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6040048.
Kreye, M. E., & Perunovic, Z. (2020). You don’t forget where you come from: linking formation and operations in publicly funded innovation networks. Production Planning & Control, 31(10), 816–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1693066.
Kurian, M., & Ardakanian, R. (2015). The nexus approach to governance of environmental resources considering global change. In M. Kurian, R. Ardakanian (Eds.), Governing the Nexus (pp. 57–68). Cham, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05747-7_1.
Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582.
Levalle, R. R., & Nof, S. Y. (2015). Resilience by teaming in supply network formation and re-configuration. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.036.
Li, Y., & Chen, M. (2015). Software-defined network function virtualization: a survey. IEEE Access, 3, 2542–2553. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2015.2499271.
Liu, Z., Peng, C., Work, T., Candau, J. N., DesRochers, A., & Kneeshaw, D. (2018). Application of machine-learning methods in forest ecology: recent progress and future challenges. Environmental Reviews, 26(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0034.
Livesley, S. J., McPherson, E. G., & Calfapietra, C. (2016). The urban forest and ecosystem services: impacts on urban water, heat, and pollution cycles at the tree, street, and city scale. Journal of Environmental Quality, 45(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.11.0567.
Locatelli, B., Pramova, E., Di Gregorio, M., Brockhaus, M., Chávez, D. A., Tubbeh, R., ... & Perla, J. (2020). Climate change policy networks: connecting adaptation and mitigation in multiplex networks in Peru. Climate Policy, 20(3), 354–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1730153.
Löw, C. (2020). Gender and indigenous concepts of climate protection: a critical revision of REDD+ projects. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 43, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.03.002.
Lowman, M. D., Schowalter, T., & Franklin, J. (2019). Methods in forest canopy research. Berkeley, University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520953925.
Lu, D., Chen, Q., Wang, G., Liu, L., Li, G., & Moran, E. (2016). A survey of remote sensing-based aboveground biomass estimation methods in forest ecosystems. International Journal of Digital Earth, 9(1), 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2014.990526.
Magagnotti, N., Kanzian, C., Schulmeyer, F., & Spinelli, R. (2013). A new guide for work studies in forestry. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 24(3), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2013.856613.
Mattila, M. (2015). Network formation of technological innovation (Dissertation). Tampere, University of Tampere. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276936845_Network_Formation_of_Technological_innovation.
McCollum, D. L., Echeverri, L. G., Busch, S., Pachauri, S., Parkinson, S., Rogelj, J., ... & Riahi, K. (2018). Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages. Environmental Research Letters, 13(3), 033006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaafe3.
Menzel, K. (2015). Strategic network formation with many agents. Available at: https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/wp.nyu.edu/dist/9/2027/files/2015/05/network_formation-1.pdf?bid=2027.
Mignon, I. (2016). Inducing large-scale diffusion of innovation: an integrated actor-and system-level approach (Dissertations No. 17771777). Linköping University Electronic Press. https://doi.org/10.3384/diss.diva-131029.
Milhorance, C., Le Coq, J. F., & Sabourin, E. (2021). Dealing with cross-sectoral policy problems: an advocacy coalition approach to climate and water policy integration in Northeast Brazil. Policy Sciences, 54, 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09422-6.
Möck, M. (2021). Patterns of policy networks at the local level in Germany. Review of Policy Research, 38(4), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12413.
Mori, A. S., Lertzman, K. P., & Gustafsson, L. (2017). Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54(1), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12669.
Murphy, J., & Gouldson, A. (2020). Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernisation. In The Ecological Modernisation Reader (pp. 275–294). London, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003061069-19.
Novick, K. A., Ficklin, D. L., Stoy, P. C., Williams, C. A., Bohrer, G., Oishi, A. C., ... & Phillips, R. P. (2016). The increasing importance of atmospheric demand for ecosystem water and carbon fluxes. Nature Climate Change, 6(11), 1023–1027. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3114.
Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2019). Why and how to compete through sustainability: a review and outline of trends influencing firm and network-level transformation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00558-9.
Poddar, R., Qureshi, M. E., & Shi, T. (2014). A comparison of water policies for sustainable irrigation management: the case of India and Australia. Water Resources Management, 28, 1079–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0535-0.
Pommerening, A., & Grabarnik, P. (2019). Individual-based methods in forest ecology and management, vol. 411. Cham, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24528-3.
Qvist, M. (2017). Meta‐governance and network formation in collaborative spaces of uncertainty: the case of Swedish refugee integration policy. Public Administration, 95(2), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12310.
Rasul, G. (2014). Food, water, and energy security in South Asia: a nexus perspective from the Hindu Kush Himalayan region. Environmental Science & Policy, 39, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.010.
Romberger, J. A., & Mikola, P. (1964). Preface. International Review of Forestry Research, 1, vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4831-9975-7.50005-3.
Rönnqvist, M., D’Amours, S., Weintraub, A., Jofre, A., Gunn, E., Haight, R. G., ... & Romero, C. (2015). Operations research challenges in forestry: 33 open problems. Annals of Operations Research, 232, 11–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1907-4.
Scott, C. A., Kurian, M., & Wescoat, J. L. (2015). The water-energy-food nexus: enhancing adaptive capacity to complex global challenges. In M. Kurian, R. Ardakanian (Eds), Governing the Nexus: Water, Soil and Waste Resources Considering Global Change (pp. 15–38). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05747-7_2.
Segato, F., & Raab, J. (2019). Mandated network formation. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 32(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-01-2018-0018.
Seidl, R., Spies, T. A., Peterson, D. L., Stephens, S. L., & Hicke, J. A. (2016). Searching for resilience: addressing the impacts of changing disturbance regimes on forest ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53(1), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12511.
Serrao-Neumann, S., Crick, F., Harman, B., Sano, M., Sahin, O., Van Staden, R., ... & Low Choy, D. (2014). Improving cross-sectoral climate change adaptation for coastal settlements: insights from South East Queensland, Australia. Regional Environmental Change, 14, 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0442-6.
Shi, Y., Wang, S., Zhou, S., & Kamruzzaman, M. M. (2020). Study on modeling method of forest tree image recognition based on CCD and theodolite. IEEE Access, 8, 159067–159076. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018180.
Singh, S. K., Srivastava, P. K., Gupta, M., Thakur, J. K., & Mukherjee, S. (2014). Appraisal of land use/land cover of mangrove forest ecosystem using support vector machine. Environmental Earth Sciences, 71(5), 2245–2255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2628-0.
Sotirov, M., & Arts, B. (2018). Integrated forest governance in Europe: an introduction to the special issue on forest policy integration and integrated forest management. Land Use Policy, 79, 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.042.
Swain, R. B., & Ranganathan, S. (2021). Modeling interlinkages between sustainable development goals using network analysis. World Development, 138, 105136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105136.
Tang, L., & Shao, G. (2015). Drone remote sensing for forestry research and practices. Journal of Forestry Research, 26, 791–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0088-y.
Trein, P., & Maggetti, M. (2020). Patterns of policy integration and administrative coordination reforms: a comparative empirical analysis. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13117.
Trein, P., Maggetti, M., & Meyer, I. (2021). Necessary conditions for policy integration and administrative coordination reforms: an exploratory analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(9), 1410–1431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1788121.
Velázquez Gomar, J. O. (2016). Environmental policy integration among multilateral environmental agreements: the case of biodiversity. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16, 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9263-4.
Von Lüpke, H., & Well, M. (2020). Analyzing climate and energy policy integration: the case of the Mexican energy transition. Climate Policy, 20(7), 832–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1648236.
Wallace, H., Pollack, M. A., Roederer-Rynning, C., & Young, A. R. (Eds.). (2020). Policy-making in the European Union, 8th ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198807605.001.0001.
Wang, Y., Zhang, W., Gao, R., Jin, Z., & Wang, X. (2021). Recent advances in the application of deep learning methods to forestry. Wood Science and Technology, 55(5), 1171–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-021-01309-2.
Wäsche, H. (2015). Interorganizational cooperation in sport tourism: a social network analysis. Sport Management Review, 18(4), 542–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2015.01.003.
Wiedemann, R., & Ingold, K. (2022). Solving cross-sectoral policy problems: adding a cross-sectoral dimension to assess policy performance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 24(5), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2021.1960809.
Wong, R. (2019). Balancing institutions for implementing the Sustainable Development Goals through “network within the hierarchy”. Sustainability, 11(16), 4498. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164498.
Yi, H., & Scholz, J. T. (2016). Policy networks in complex governance subsystems: observing and comparing hyperlink, media, and partnership networks. Policy Studies Journal, 44(3), 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12141.
Yi, H., & Yuan, M. (2023). Policy advocacy, network formation and network governance. Chinese Public Administration Review, 14(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754221145421.
