Incommensurate environmental risks and the regulator’s dilemma in the governance of emergency situation

Authors

  • Vesela Radovic Belgrade University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2016.02.04.37

Keywords:

environmental risk, environmental emergency, emergency situation, governance

Abstract

In the 21st century humans face with the great risk how to protect themselves from disasters of different kinds. Emergencies happened in many countries and caused a great suffering of humans. The main question of stakeholders is: ‘’how to protect human health and environment in an adequate way’’. Emergency management is an issue which is included in numerous education institutions all over the globe and the action of various national and international organizations. Therefore it is interesting that in the process of fostering emergency management many countries neglect the need of creating more effective tools for response, preparedness and recovery in environmental emergencies. The paper is based on analyzes of Serbian approach in the governance of emergency situation followed by incommensurate environmental risks. Serbia had to accept International environmental emergency help after the floods in 2014. The Joint United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) / Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) Environment Unit (JEU) helped Serbia to mitigate consequences of horrified environmental emergency in “Stolice” mine near city Krupanj. This assistance was needed because Serbia did not have enough capacity to struggle with the consequences of breaking the dam and contamination of soil and rivers. This study shows that a similar disaster in the future could be solved only by strengthening multilateral response of different actors at local and national level. After all, Serbia is at the beginning of the path, and need to highlight strategic challenges in the governance of emergency situation followed by environmental emergencies. Only with full implementation of positive practice of the international community Serbia could avoid long term impact on life support functions, nature and humans.

References

Andjelkovic, G. (2010). Climate Extremes in Serbia, definitions, types and classification, Bulletin of the Serbian Geographical Society, Tome XC No4, pp.125-137.

Arabska, E., Grigorova, Z., Radovic, V. (2015). Protection of cultural and historical heritage of natural disasters and extreme climatic events. International conference "Cultural corridor Via Adriatica - cultural tourism without boundaries", 15-19 October 2015, pp. 287-294.

Beck, U. (2006). Living in the world risk society. Economy and Society, Volume 35, Number 3, pp. 329-345.

Brauch, H. G. (2005). Reconceptualising security from national to environmental and human security. International security, peace, development and environment. Vol. II. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Available at: http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c14/E1-39B-25.pdf/.

Buzan B., Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers. The structure of international security. Cambridge Studies in International Relations: 91. Available at: http://blogriobranco. files.wordpress.com/2010/04/buzan.pdf.

Ecological society of America (ESA). http://www.esa.org/esa.

Global Climate Risk Index 2014. Who Suffers Most from Extreme Weather Events? Weather-Related Loss Events in 2012 and 1993 to 2012. Sönke Kreft & David Eckstein. Germanwatch e.V. www.germanwatch.org/en/cri.

Global Risks 2014 Insight report, Ninth Edition, World economic forum. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalRisks_Report_2014.pdf.

Hakala, E. (2012). Cooperation for the enhancement of environmental citizenship in the context of securitization: The case of an OSCE Project in Serbia. Journal of Civil Society, Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 385-399.

INFORM 2015. http://www.inform-index.org/Results/Global.

International Panel for Climate Change IPPC. 2007. The Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change (ARW 4). Geneva, Switzerland.

Progress in the management of Contaminated Sites in Europe, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Centre reference report, EC, 2014. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/111111111/30755/1/lbna26376enn.pdf.

Radovic, V., Arabska, E. (2015). Preventing contamination in disasters - from theory to the practice in Serbia. XXIII International Conference "ECOLOGICAL TRUTH" Eco-Ist'15, 17 – 20 June 2015, Serbia, pp. 653 660.

Radovic, V., Jovanovic, L., Tomic-Hrabovski, E. (2011). Methods for mitigation of environmental risks to the AP Vojvodina environment, Ecologica, 18 (63), pp. 383 390.

Radović, V., Rakić, S. (2013). The management of contaminated sites and soil remediation in Serbia. Scientific Proceedings XXI International Scientific and Professional Meeting “Ecological Truth” Eco-Ist ‘13 (4-7 June, 2013, Bor, Serbia), Publisher: University of Belgrade, Technical Faculty in Bor, Republic of Serbia, pp. 323-330,

Radović, V., Trivan, D. (2014). Do we really understand why environment became an important task for the intelligence community in the global world. In: Intelligence and combating terrorism-new paradigm and future challenges, Eds.: D. Caleta and Paul Shemela. Published by the Institute for Corporative Security Studies-ICS, Slovenia and Centre for Civil –Military Relations, Naval Postgraduate School Monterey USA, pp. 53-66.

Report on the environmental status in the Republic of Serbia in 2010. Agency for environmental protection. http://www.kombeg.org.rs/Slike/CeTranIRazvojTehnologija/2011/2011%20Decembar/Izvestaj%20o%20stanju%20zivotne%20sredine%20za%202010%20godinu.pdf/.

Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA), Ministry of Environment, Mining and Spatial Planning. http://www.sepa.gov.rs/download/SEPA_ECOEXPO_2015.pdf/.

Taboroff, J. (2001). Cultural heritage and natural disasters: incentives for risk management and mitigation. In: Managing Disaster Risk in Emerging Economies. A. Kreimer, M. Arnold, pp. 71-79.

Terziev, V., Arabska, E., Radovic, V. (2015). Risk communications in environmental crises advent on the Balkans, 15th EBES Conference – Lisbon, January 08-10, 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Proceedings CD Volume 4, pp. 2103-2121.

Terziev, V., Radovic, V., Arabska, E. (2014). Biodiversity risks of natural disasters and extreme climatic events in Serbia. International scientific and practical conference, 1 December, 2014, Ufa-Aeterna, pp. 70-77.

Ullman, R. H. (1983). Redefining security. International Security, Vol. 8, No. 1. (Summer, 1983), pp. 129-153.

United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/who-we-are/international-strategy-for-disaster-reduction/.

World Development Report 2014: Risk and Opportunity: Managing Risk for Development. The World Bank. Available at: http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTRESEARCH/EXTWDRS/EXTNWDR2013/0,,contentMDK:23459971~pagePK:8261309~piPK:8258028~theSitePK:8258025,00.html.

World Risk Report 2011. Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft, UNU, EHS. http://worldriskreport.entwicklung-hilft.de/Report.435.0.html.

World Risk Report 2012. Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft, UNU, EHS. http://worldriskreport.entwicklung-hilft.de/Report.435.0.html.

World Risk Report 2012. Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft, UNU, EHS. http://worldriskreport.entwicklung-hilft.de/Report.435.0.html.

World Risk Report 2013. Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft, UNU, EHS. http://worldriskreport.entwicklung-hilft.de/Report.435.0.html.

World Risk Report 2014. Bündnis Entwicklung Hilft, UNU, EHS. http://worldriskreport.entwicklung-hilft.de/Report.435.0.html.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-01

How to Cite

Radovic, V. (2016). Incommensurate environmental risks and the regulator’s dilemma in the governance of emergency situation. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 2(4), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2016.02.04.37

Issue

Section

Multidisciplinary