The change in the approach of the court of Justice of the European Union in the context of market freedoms and internal situations

Authors

  • Venelin Terziev Vasil Levski National Military University – Veliko Tarnovo
  • Stefcho Bankov Vasil Levski National Military University – Veliko Tarnovo
  • Marin Georgiev Vasil Levski National Military University – Veliko Tarnovo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2018.04.03.85

Keywords:

market freedoms, the linking factor test, preliminary reference rulings

Abstract

In its jurisprudence the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has changed its approach towards the purely internal situation rule applicable in the context of the market freedoms. From the 1990s onwards the Court has showed a greater leniency in accepting that certain cases fall within the scope of Union law, as compared to in the years before. This has been done in various ways, depending on the specific fundamental freedom at stake in the case, but always resulted in a relaxing of the fulfilment of the test used for determining whether a case falls within the scope of a market freedom - the linking factor test. More specifically, the Court seems to be accepting that hypothetical future scenarios are sufficient to bring a case within the scope of EU law even though the underlying facts of the case do not satisfy the test, or even to rule in cases which clearly do not fulfil some of the conditions of the test. The overall change of approach towards the purely internal rule can also be seen in an issue of jurisdiction, and not scope, which is still however relevant. This is the fact that the Court has begun issuing preliminary reference rulings in purely internal cases whereby the question referred is in reality hypothetical. It will be claimed that the CJEU does so without requiring sufficient proof by the domestic court that an EU law interpretation is required.

References

Glocken case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61985CJ0407/.

Alpine Investments case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61993CC0384/.

Blanco Perez case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62007CJ0570/.

Bosman case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61993CJ0415/.

Carpenter case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62000CJ0060/.

Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012E%2FTXT/.

Corsica Ferries case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61993CJ0018/.

Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/institutions-bodies/court-justice_en/.

Debauve case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61979CJ0052/.

Dzodzi case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61988CJ0297/.

EEC Treaty. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM%3Axy0023/.

Guimont case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61998CJ0448/.

Höfner case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61990CJ0041/.

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2002. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=ecli:ECLI:EU:C:2002:750/.

Knoors case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61978CJ0115/.

Lancry case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61993CJ0363/.

Libert case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62011CJ0197/.

Mathot case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61986CJ0098/.

Morson and Jhanjan case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61982CJ0035/.

Oosthoek’s uitgeversmaatschappij BV case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61981CJ0286/.

Parking Brixen case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62003CJ0458/.

Pistre case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LV/TXT/?uri=CELEX:61994CJ0321/.

Ritter-Coulais case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62003CJ0152 /.

Salzmann case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=ecli%3AECLI%3AEU%3AC%3A2003%3A283/.

Saunders case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61978CJ0175/.

SIOT case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61981CJ0266/.

Terziev, V., Petkov, M., Krastev, D. (2018a). Concept of joint investigation teams. Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2018 - 5th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, 2-4 July 2018 - Dubai, U.A.E, International Organization Center of Academic Research, pp.492-496.

Terziev, V., Petkov, M., Krastev, D. (2018b). Eurojust casework on mafia-type criminal organisations. Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2018 - 5th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, 2-4 July 2018 - Dubai, U.A.E, International Organization Center of Academic Research, pp. 487-491.

Terziev, V., Petkov, M., Krastev, D. (2018c). European arrest warrant: appearance and preferences for fulfillment. Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2018 - 5th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, 2-4 July 2018 - Dubai, U.A.E, International Organization Center of Academic Research, pp. 477-481.

Terziev, V., Petkov, M., Krastev, D. (2018d). European arrest warrant and human rights of the accused. Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2018 - 5th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, 2-4 July 2018 - Dubai, U.A.E, International Organization Center of Academic Research, pp. 501-504.

Terziev, V., Petkov, M., Krastev, D. (2018e). Operative mode for police cooperation between the member states of the European Union. Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2018 - 5th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, 2-4 July 2018 - Dubai, U.A.E, International Organization Center of Academic Research, pp.473-476.

Terziev, V., Petkov, M., Krastev, D. (2018f). Organization on the European Union in the sphere of penal preparation. Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2018 - 5th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, 2-4 July 2018 - Dubai, U.A.E, International Organization Center of Academic Research, pp. 482-486.

Terziev, V., Petkov, M., Krastev, D. (2018g). Pumps for the action on the European Union in the scope of the European agenda on security. Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2018 - 5th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, 2-4 July 2018 - Dubai, U.A.E, International Organization Center of Academic Research, pp. 497- 500.

Terziev, V., Petkov, M., Krastev, D. (2018h). Sources of European Union law. Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2018 - 5th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, 2-4 July 2018 - Dubai, U.A.E, International Organization Center of Academic Research, pp. 511-516.

Terziev, V., Petkov, M., Krastev, D. (2018i). The “Source of law” category. Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2018 - 5th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, 2-4 July 2018 - Dubai, U.A.E, International Organization Center of Academic Research, pp. 517-521.

Terziev, V., Petkov, M., Krastev, D. (2018j). The process of forming a criminal policy of the European Union. Proceedings of SOCIOINT 2018 - 5th International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, 2-4 July 2018 - Dubai, U.A.E, International Organization Center of Academic Research, pp. 505-510.

Ullens de Schooten case. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62015CJ0268/.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-01

How to Cite

Terziev, V., Bankov, S., & Georgiev, M. (2018). The change in the approach of the court of Justice of the European Union in the context of market freedoms and internal situations. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 4(3), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.51599/is.2018.04.03.85

Issue

Section

Multidisciplinary

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>